Contemporary Clinical Dentistry

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year
: 2022  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 113--117

Comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of an alkasite restorative material and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An In vivo study


MP Pooja1, YM Karuna1, Arathi Rao1, Ethel Suman2, Srikant Natarajan3, BS Suprabha1 
1 Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India
2 Department of Microbiology, KMC, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Mangalore, Karnataka, India
3 Department of Oral Pathology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Y M Karuna
Department of Paedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Mangalore Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Karnataka
India

Background: Cention N is relatively new and an “alkasite” restorative material, indicated for direct restorations. Aim: The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the sealing ability of Cention N and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GIC) when used to restore primary molars. Methods and Materials: It is a split-mouth study. Twenty children having bilateral deep dentinal caries involving primary molars requiring restoration were selected. After caries excavation under the rubber dam, samples were collected from the cavity. Restorations of the teeth were done using either resin-modified GIC (RMGIC) or Cention N. Patients were recalled after 6 weeks and the restorations done previously were removed using contra angled micromotor handpiece under rubber dam isolation. The samples were collected again. The collected samples were used to estimate the total viable count. Statistical Analysis: The pretreatment, posttreatment colony counts, and the differences between the groups were analyzed using paired t-test. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in the mean differences of the pre- and posttreatment colony count between alkasite restorative material and RMGIC (P = 0.056). Conclusion: Restorations done using alkasite restorative material and RMGIC performed equally in terms of sealing ability.


How to cite this article:
Pooja M P, Karuna Y M, Rao A, Suman E, Natarajan S, Suprabha B S. Comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of an alkasite restorative material and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An In vivo study.Contemp Clin Dent 2022;13:113-117


How to cite this URL:
Pooja M P, Karuna Y M, Rao A, Suman E, Natarajan S, Suprabha B S. Comparative evaluation of the sealing ability of an alkasite restorative material and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in primary molars: An In vivo study. Contemp Clin Dent [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Oct 6 ];13:113-117
Available from: https://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2022;volume=13;issue=2;spage=113;epage=117;aulast=Pooja;type=0