Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
   
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |

 

Login  | Users Online: 2  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 

    Article Cited by others

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Assessment of clinical outcomes of Roth and MBT bracket prescription using the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System

Jain Mahesh, Varghese Joseph, Mascarenhas Rohan, Mogra Subraya, Shetty Siddarth, Dhakar Nidhi

Year : 2013| Volume: 4| Issue : 3 | Page no: 307-312

   This article has been cited by
 
1 Occlusal outcome after orthodontic treatment with preadjusted straight-wire and standard edgewise appliances
Spyridon N. Papageorgiou, Raphael Tilen, Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic, Theodore Eliades
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2021; 82(5): 321
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Comparison of Roth and McLaughlin-Bennet-Trevisi prescriptions as two popular pre-adjusted orthodontic bracket systems: a systematic review
Parastoo Namdar, Erfan Bardideh, Farzaneh Lal Alizadeh, Arezoo Jahanbin, Neda Eslami
Orthodontic Waves. 2020; 79(2-3): 65
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Influence of clinical experience on accuracy of virtual orthodontic attachment bonding in comparison with the direct procedure
Natalice S. De Oliveira, Emile Rossouw, Elizabeth M. B. Lages, Soraia Macari, Henrique Pretti
The Angle Orthodontist. 2019; 89(5): 734
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 A Comparison of class I malocclusion treatment outcomes with and without extractions using an ABO grading system for dental casts and radiographs
Bunga Ayub Rukiah, Amalia Oeripto, Nurhayati Harahap
Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi). 2018; 50(3): 144
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
5 Treatment effects of various prescriptions and techniques for fixed orthodontic appliances
Sophia Mousoulea,Spyridon N. Papageorgiou,Theodore Eliades
Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2017;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
6 Orthodontic treatment results evaluated for individual teeth according to the Objective Grading System
Oscar Zapata-Noreña,Alvaro Carvajal-Flórez,Diana Barbosa-Liz
Journal of the World Federation of Orthodontists. 2017; 6(1): 6
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
7 Relationship between Discrepancy Index and the Objective Grading System in Thai board of orthodontics Patients
Nita Viwattanatipa,Weerawat Buapuean,Chulaluk Komoltri
Orthodontic Waves. 2016; 75(3): 54
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
8 University clinic and private practice treatment outcomes in Class I extraction and nonextraction patients: A comparative study with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System
Barbara Mislik,Dimitrios Konstantonis,Alexios Katsadouris,Theodore Eliades
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2016; 149(2): 253
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
9 Applications of cone-beam computed tomography to assess the effects of labial crown morphologies and collum angles on torque for maxillary anterior teeth
Wei-Dong Kong,Jun-Yu Ke,Xiang-Quan Hu,Wu Zhang,Shu-Shu Li,Yi Feng
American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2016; 150(5): 789
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]

 

Read this article