Contemporary Clinical Dentistry
  Home | About us | Editorial board | Search
Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Advertise
Instructions | Online submission| Contact us | Subscribe |


Login  | Users Online: 235  Print this pageEmail this pageSmall font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size 

    Article Cited by others


Comparative investigation of clinical/radiographical signs of mineral trioxide aggregate and formocresol on pulpotomized primary molars

Hugar Shivayogi M, Deshpande Shobha D

Year : 2010| Volume: 1| Issue : 3 | Page no: 146-151

   This article has been cited by
1 Assessment of Clinical and Radiographic Success Rate of Formocresol-based Pulpotomy versus Collagen-based Pulpotomy: An In Vivo Study
Parthiban Saket, Shanmugavadivel Gandhi, Vasanthakumari Anandan, Jaiganesh Inbanathan, Vivek Krishnamoorthy, Vignesh Krishnapillai Chandrababu
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2021; 22(6): 680
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
2 Different Pulp Dressing Materials for the Pulpotomy of Primary Teeth: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Maurizio Bossù, Flavia Iaculli, Gianni Di Giorgio, Alessandro Salucci, Antonella Polimeni, Stefano Di Carlo
Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2020; 9(3): 838
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
3 Clinical and Radiographic Evaluations of Biodentine™ Pulpotomies in Mature Primary Molars (Stage 2)
Fouad Ayoub, Hitaf Nasrallah, Balsam El Noueiri, Charles Pilipili
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2018; 11(6): 496
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
4 Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Success Rates of Pulpotomy in Primary Molars using Ferric Sulfate and Bioactive Tricalcium Silicate Cement: An in vivo Study
Mohita Marwaha, Kavita Sirohi, Kalpana Bansal, Ankit Srivastava
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2017; 10(2): 147
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
5 Efficacy of three different pulpotomy agents in primary molars: a randomized control trial
S. Rajasekharan,L. C. Martens,J. Vandenbulcke,W. Jacquet,P. Bottenberg,R. G. E. C. Cauwels
International Endodontic Journal. 2017; 50(3): 215
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
6 Mineral trioxide aggregate and other bioactive endodontic cements: an updated overview - part I: vital pulp therapy
M. Parirokh,M. Torabinejad,P. M. H. Dummer
International Endodontic Journal. 2017;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
7 Evidence of pulpotomy in primary teeth comparing MTA, calcium hydroxide, ferric sulphate, and electrosurgery with formocresol
E. Stringhini Junior,M. E. B. Vitcel,L. B. Oliveira
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2015;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
8 Odontogenic effects of a fast-setting calcium-silicate cement containing zirconium oxide
Kyoung-A KIM,Yeon-Mi YANG,Young-Sun KWON,Yun-Chan HWANG,Mi-Kyung YU,Kyung-San MIN
Dental Materials Journal. 2015; 34(4): 432
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
9 Pulpotomy Medicaments used in Deciduous Dentition: An Update
Yousef H Al-Dlaigan
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice. 2015; 16(6): 486
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
10 Clinical and radiographic success of mineral trioxide aggregate compared with formocresol as a pulpotomy treatment in primary molars
Abdullah A. Marghalani,Samah Omar,Jung-Wei Chen
The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2014; 145(7): 714
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
11 Mineral trioxide aggregate versus formocresol pulpotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Armin Shirvani,Saeed Asgary
Clinical Oral Investigations. 2014;
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]
12 Is there sufficient evidence to support the long-term efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) for endodontic therapy in primary teeth?
R. P. Anthonappa,N. M. King,L. C. Martens
International Endodontic Journal. 2013; 46(3): 198
[Pubmed]  [Google Scholar] [DOI]


Read this article